Scale up as you grow — whether you're running one virtual machine or ten thousand.

From GPU-powered inference and Kubernetes to managed databases and storage, get everything you need to build, scale, and deploy intelligent applications.

This textbox defaults to using Markdown to format your answer.
You can type !ref in this text area to quickly search our full set of tutorials, documentation & marketplace offerings and insert the link!
Could you comment on latency issues that arise when using a Galera cluster with master-master replication. For instance, if I leverage the DigitalOcean network to have a server at each of their four locations and use Galera will latency issues mean that each database INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE gets significantly slower? On a side note - from my reading of it the way Galera works I can pretty much leave my PHP PDO code unchanged and let the Galera subsystem do all the hard work. Am I right in thinking that?
I was able to follow this tutorial and set up multi master replication for MariaDB Galera on Red Hat, I posted the details at http://jmoses.co/2014/03/18/setting-up-a-mysql-cluster-with-mariadb-galera.html
Galera Cluster puts some requirements on the database (e.g. avoid MyISAM, make sure tables have pkeys), it might be worth reading through this tutorial.
http://www.severalnines.com/clustercontrol-mysql-galera-tutorial
You can also check out this webinar replay on how to migrate to Galera: http://www.severalnines.com/blog/webinar-replay-slides-migrating-mysql-mariadb-galera-percona-xtradb-cluster
What happens if node01 interrupted? When Node01 start again, it will run independently and node02 also run independently.
Thank you Nasser for the tutorial. It was very useful. I used mariadb creating three clusters of a my application’s database. My web application runs very well on multi-master replicated databases on three machines. But when i isolated a particular machine from the network, the application cant operate because it cant find database. How do i set up mariadb such that it can work even at offline or standalone state and when it connects back to other clusters i want it to sync again. Is it possible with mariadb? Thank you for your advice in advance .
I had one heck of a time getting this to work. It’s obviously a simple setup, but my secondary and tertiary nodes wouldn’t start. Below is a copy of the errors that I was getting incase anyone else has this problem. I was able to get around this by clearing the galera cache (http://dba.stackexchange.com/a/56081/37852)
140502 5:58:37 [Note] WSREP: Prepared SST request: rsync|192.168.33.12:4444/rsync_sst 140502 5:58:37 [Note] WSREP: wsrep_notify_cmd is not defined, skipping notification. 140502 5:58:37 [Note] WSREP: REPL Protocols: 5 (3, 1) 140502 5:58:37 [Note] WSREP: Service thread queue flushed. 140502 5:58:37 [Note] WSREP: Assign initial position for certification: 0, protocol version: 3 140502 5:58:37 [Note] WSREP: Service thread queue flushed. 140502 5:58:37 [Warning] WSREP: Failed to prepare for incremental state transfer: Local state UUID (00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000) does not match group state UUID (5ac22274-d1bb-11e3-8beb-2ec0f4041edd): 1 (Operation not permitted) at galera/src/replicator_str.cpp:prepare_for_IST():447. IST will be unavailable. 140502 5:58:38 [Note] WSREP: Requesting state transfer failed: -11(Resource temporarily unavailable). Will keep retrying every 1 second(s)
140502 5:59:20 [Warning] WSREP: Could not find peer: 140502 5:59:20 [Warning] WSREP: 0.0 (cluster01): State transfer to -1.-1 (left the group) failed: -255 (Unknown error 255) 140502 5:59:20 [Note] WSREP: Member 0.0 (cluster01) synced with group. 140502 5:59:20 [Note] WSREP: Member 1.0 (cluster03) requested state transfer from ‘any’. Selected 0.0 (cluster01)(SYNCED) as donor. 140502 5:59:20 [Note] WSREP: Shifting PRIMARY -> JOINER (TO: 0) 140502 5:59:20 [Note] WSREP: Requesting state transfer: success after 41 tries, donor: 0
Probably worth mentioning the known limitations of Galera Cluser (and other similar cluster systems), with one big one being that table locking is not supported. They state that “Using transactions properly should be able to overcome these limitations.”, but I’m not so sure.