By dolphinnnn
I’m building a small app on DigitalOcean and trying to keep costs reasonable.
Right now I’m debating whether to just run PostgreSQL on the same Droplet as my app, or use DigitalOcean Managed PostgreSQL instead.
The app is still pretty small, so I’m not sure if managed databases are worth it yet. I like the idea of less maintenance, backups, and easier failover, but I also don’t want to overcomplicate things too early.
For smaller projects, what are people usually doing in practice? At what point does Managed PostgreSQL start making more sense than just hosting Postgres yourself?
This textbox defaults to using Markdown to format your answer.
You can type !ref in this text area to quickly search our full set of tutorials, documentation & marketplace offerings and insert the link!
Accepted Answer
Hi there,
For smaller projects, both approaches are common:
Running Postgres on the same Droplet is usually the cheapest and simplest way to get started.
Managed PostgreSQL starts making more sense once you want less maintenance, easier backups, automated failover, and a more production-friendly setup.
If you’re still early and the app is small, self-hosting Postgres on the Droplet is often perfectly fine, especially if you’re comfortable handling updates, backups, monitoring, and recovery yourself.
That said, Managed PostgreSQL can save a lot of time because you don’t have to think as much about things like:
automated backups
patching and maintenance
failover and high availability
monitoring and alerts
easier scaling later on
So I’d usually think about it like this:
If budget is the main priority and the app is still small, running Postgres yourself is reasonable.
If reliability and lower operational overhead matter more, Managed PostgreSQL is often worth it even fairly early.
A pretty common path is to start small on a Droplet, then move to Managed PostgreSQL once the app becomes more important or once you no longer want the database living on the same machine as the application.
A few useful links here:
Managed PostgreSQL: https://www.digitalocean.com/products/managed-databases-postgresql
PostgreSQL docs on DigitalOcean: https://docs.digitalocean.com/products/databases/postgresql/
So overall, I wouldn’t say there is one universal right answer. If this is a small app and you’re optimizing for cost, self-hosting is fine. If you want to reduce operational risk and keep the setup cleaner, managed is the nicer long-term option.
Heya,
For a small project, a lot of people just run Postgres on the same Droplet at first.
That’s usually fine if you want to keep costs down and you’re okay handling backups, updates, and the database yourself. It keeps things simple in the beginning and there’s less to think about.
Managed PostgreSQL starts making more sense once the app becomes important enough that you don’t want to babysit the DB anymore. Things like automatic backups, easier failover, upgrades, and not having your app + DB on the same machine start to matter more.
So basically, if this is still small and cost-sensitive, self-hosting Postgres on the Droplet is normal. Once reliability and convenience matter more than saving a bit of money, managed DB becomes easier to justify.
Get paid to write technical tutorials and select a tech-focused charity to receive a matching donation.
Full documentation for every DigitalOcean product.
The Wave has everything you need to know about building a business, from raising funding to marketing your product.
Stay up to date by signing up for DigitalOcean’s Infrastructure as a Newsletter.
New accounts only. By submitting your email you agree to our Privacy Policy
Scale up as you grow — whether you're running one virtual machine or ten thousand.
Sign up and get $200 in credit for your first 60 days with DigitalOcean.*
*This promotional offer applies to new accounts only.