Scale up as you grow — whether you're running one virtual machine or ten thousand.

From GPU-powered inference and Kubernetes to managed databases and storage, get everything you need to build, scale, and deploy intelligent applications.

This textbox defaults to using Markdown to format your answer.
You can type !ref in this text area to quickly search our full set of tutorials, documentation & marketplace offerings and insert the link!
Ubuntu now has the latest version of Bash sent out to their repositories. More info here:
http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2014/CVE-2014-7169.html
Thanks for this. Fixed it on my home computer and remote server. Awesome!
After update, is there any need to restart anything ??
I am with CentOS 6.5 x32
Hey Guys,
I just checked & updated the path on one of our production server.
After doing a “yum update bash”, rechecked:
env VAR=‘() { :;}; echo Bash is vulnerable!’ bash -c “echo Bash Test”
It simply gave below output:
Bash Test
Is this still vulnerable or patches updated? Please suggest.
Cheers, Vasu
Here’s Puppet code to patch it on CentOS:
exec { 'patch_shellshock_security_hole':
command => "/usr/bin/yes | /usr/bin/yum update bash; touch /root/shellshock_bug_has_been_patched",
creates => '/root/shellshock_bug_has_been_patched',
}
I have just tested this code and it worked fine on CentOS 6.4.
Ross
i have 4.5.1(1) on 2 Ubuntu Servers. Does that mean not vulnerable? Test says otherwise. You state 4.3 is the latest.
I think, even if it’s not vulnerable, it’s a good idea to update bash to lastest version
I have Ubuntu 12.10 that is not more supported… what the best way to upgrade?
I hadn’t touched my droplet in quite a while - turns out I’m on 12.04 which has been EOL’ed and can’t seem to be updated. Any suggestions on how to handle this?