spam.roop
By:
spam.roop

DNS problem: not resolving correctly; dig response includes "status: REFUSED"

October 31, 2013 11.9k views
I've got four domains, all of which I would like to point to a placeholder page (running on a LAMP droplet) while I develop my site. Two of the domains are resolving properly, and two are not. I've followed the steps in your DNS Tips and Tricks article (https://digitalocean.com/community/articles/dns-tips-and-tricks). 1) whois confirms that ns1, ns2, & ns3 at digital ocean are the name servers for all four domains 2) but dig shows that the two non-resolving domains are having some kind of issue, which I can't decipher. the GOOD domain includes this in the dig response: ;; ->>HEADER<>HEADER<
Log In to Comment
6 Answers
spam.roop October 31, 2013
Whoops appending the dig response in a way that doesn't break the html formatting of the post…

The GOOD ones...

;; HEADER opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 22718
;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available

The BAD ones…


;; HEADER opcode: QUERY, status: REFUSED, id: 22254
;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available
Reply
spam.roop October 31, 2013
And since the end of the post got eaten :) what I had said was that all four domains are configured identically in the DO DNS control panel, so any leads on why the status: REFUSED shows up in the dig response?

Thanks.
Reply
pablo October 31, 2013
How much time has passed? Remember that DNS records can take up to 48 hours to propagate throughout the Internet.
Reply
spam.roop October 31, 2013
Thanks -- it's been about 24 hours, though I will note that the two "good" domains began resolving within just a couple of hours.

Also, does the propagation time affect the whois data and the dig data equally?
Reply
kamaln7 MOD October 31, 2013
What are the domain names?
Reply
spam.roop October 31, 2013
Actually all four are resolving properly now. I was thrown off by the fact that two took much longer to resolve.

Thank you both for your assistance.
Reply
Have another answer? Share your knowledge.