Related

Join the DigitalOcean Community Community

Join 1M+ other developers and:

  • Get help and share knowledge in Q&A
  • Subscribe to topics of interest
  • Get courses & tools that help you grow as a developer or small business owner
 Join Now
GUI for MongoDB needed to mange Meteor app Question Question
Why are snapshots so slow Question Question

Question

How to have unique_name with Ansible and DO?

Posted April 21, 2016 3.9k views
UbuntuConfiguration ManagementAnsible

Trying to get my Ansible playbook to keep unique_names, but I can’t get this feature to work. Followed the tutorial on Ansible with DO 2.0 Api, but every time I run my playbook, totally new droplets are created with the SAME names!

Here’s my playbook, which otherwise works fine.

---
- hosts: digitalocean

  vars:
    do_token: xxxx
    droplets:
    - droplet-one
    - droplet-two

  tasks:
  - name: ensure key exists at DigitalOcean
    digital_ocean: >
      state=present
      command=ssh
      name=demo
      ssh_pub_key={{ lookup('file', '~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub') }}
      api_token={{ do_token }}
    register: demo


  - name: ensure droplets exist
    digital_ocean:
      state: present
      command: droplet
      name: "{{item}}"
      unique_name: yes
      size_id: 512mb
      region_id: sfo1
      image_id: 15764687
      private_networking: "yes"
      ssh_key_ids: "{{ demo.ssh_key.id }}"
      api_token: "{{ do_token }}"
    with_items: "{{droplets}}"
    register: droplet_details

  - debug: msg="IP is {{ item.droplet.ip_address }}"
    with_items: droplet_details.results
Add a comment
carsoncole
By:
carsoncole

Related

Join the DigitalOcean Community Community

Join 1M+ other developers and:

  • Get help and share knowledge in Q&A
  • Subscribe to topics of interest
  • Get courses & tools that help you grow as a developer or small business owner
 Join Now
GUI for MongoDB needed to mange Meteor app Question Question
Why are snapshots so slow Question Question
Add a comment
1 comment
  • carsoncole April 22, 2016
    Reply Report

    Using dopy 0.3.5, the private networking option also does not work, however will work if you use dopy 0.3.6.

    dopy 0.3.7 is broken and will cause a

    NameError: name 'DoError' is not defined

These answers are provided by our Community. If you find them useful, show some love by clicking the heart. If you run into issues leave a comment, or add your own answer to help others.

×
Submit an Answer
2 answers
BrookDO April 21, 2016

Hi,

One thing I noticed that would cause this is that your uniquename: yes statement should instead be uniquename=yes to match the tutorial:

  • name: ensure droplet one exists digitalocean: > state=present command=droplet name=droplet-one uniquename=yes size_id=512mb Additionally, it’s likely the dual name declarations will cause an issue - It looks like you will need to use either - name: ensure key exists at DigitalOcean or - name: ensure droplets exist for this to work as expected.
Reply Report
  • carsoncole April 22, 2016

    Hi Brook,
    Thanks for helping.

    Either format seems to work (and frankly is easier to read using key:value), and in fact it otherwise works fine with no errors, with all of the set values, for size, region, image_id etc. Just to be sure, I converted the format back to the tutorial and it was no different: every time I ran it, another droplet is created with the same name.

        - name: Ensure droplet exists
      digital_ocean: >
        state=present
        command=droplet
        name=droplet-test
        unique_name=yes
        size_id=512mb
        region_id=sfo1
        image_id=ubuntu-14-04-x64
        private_networking=yes
        ssh_key_ids="{{ demo.ssh_key.id }}"
        api_token="{{ do_token }}"
      register: droplet_details

    As for your second point, my ‘names’ for the two tasks are different, so there shouldn’t be any issues? Maybe I’m not understanding.

    - name: ensure key exists at DigitalOcean
- name: Ensure droplet exists

    I’m wondering if its my version of Ansible at 2.0.2.0.

    Reply Report
ulutter March 14, 2017

I had the same issue. Downgrading ansible to version 2.0 worked for me:

sudo pip install 'ansible>=2.0,<2.1'

If you then run your playbook you will see the following deprecation warning which points to the actual issue with latest ansible versions:

[DEPRECATION WARNING]: Using bare variables is deprecated. Update your playbooks so that the environment value uses the
 full variable syntax ('{{droplet_details.results}}').
This feature will be removed in a future release. Deprecation
warnings can be disabled by setting deprecation_warnings=False in ansible.cfg.

Hope that helps somebody :)

Reply Report

Related

Looking for something else?

Ask a new question Search for more help