Join 1M+ other developers and:
- Get help and share knowledge in Q&A
- Subscribe to topics of interest
- Get courses & tools that help you grow as a developer or small business owner
Is there consistency between how volume and mount points are named?
What is the convention on how external block storage devices are named and how mount points are named?
I have volume whose naming follows this pattern:
I expect that mountpoint and partitions will follow the same pattern:
Instead the result is
Can we have volume names, mount points, and partitions adher to the same convention? This is a great help with provision and configuration tools.