Report this

What is the reason for this report?

Running memcached in self, or in a separate, droplet?

Posted on October 12, 2013

I’m thinking about using memcached and before reading https://www.digitalocean.com/community/questions/running-memcache-on-separate-droplet-worth-it I didn’t think of running memcached on a separate droplet/server.

Given, for example, that I had a 2GB droplet and would like to give memcached 2GB (just for keeping simple this example), what would you think of getting another 2GB droplet? and of having only one droplet but x2 capacity (4GB)?

Informed advice is much appreciated. Thanks!



This textbox defaults to using Markdown to format your answer.

You can type !ref in this text area to quickly search our full set of tutorials, documentation & marketplace offerings and insert the link!

These answers are provided by our Community. If you find them useful, show some love by clicking the heart. If you run into issues leave a comment, or add your own answer to help others.

Pablo <br>That is a very good advice, thanks :)

It depends on the amount of load you’re going to put the servers through. What are you hosting on your servers? Website(s)? App(s)? Mostly static content? Or, mostly dynamic?

I’ll be hosting a dynamic website with more read than write operations, kind of news site. Users will be able to log in but I expect to have anonymous traffic mainly.

The developer cloud

Scale up as you grow — whether you're running one virtual machine or ten thousand.

Get started for free

Sign up and get $200 in credit for your first 60 days with DigitalOcean.*

*This promotional offer applies to new accounts only.