The logic of Disabling Root Login

April 30, 2015 1.8k views
Linux Basics Getting Started LAMP Stack Deployment DigitalOcean Security Ubuntu

So my droplet was hacked twice. And the third version is up. Fingers crossed.

The mistake I made in the first two was that I had root + password login enabled. I've learned since that there are brute-force bots out there that keep trying passwords until they get through. So I'm going the private SSH key route this time, no password.

What I learned in the process: By default Ubuntu Linux doesn't limit password attempts in any way. You can keep trying different passwords forever. Shiver.

I have several questions about the logic of disabling root login:

  1. Would it still be possible for the non-root user to use "su" to become root? If yes, then how many password attempts are allowed (i.e., is this too a situation where by default there's no limit to password attempts?).

  2. One would still need "root-like" access to the server once in a while, e.g., to give new users "sudo" privileges, etc. Presumably one would have a non-root user account with "sudo" privileges so that one can have such "root-like" access. Why is that not as big of a security threat as having root login enabled?

  3. Do experienced Linux server admins typically set up a non-root user such that one would need a private SSH key AND a password? This seems to me to be the safest option.

Note: I realize that the root username is an issue here. But given infinite free attempts, bruteforcing any username + password combination is just a matter of time.

1 comment
1 Answer

Yup SSH keys are the way to go - my SSH config has root login disabled completely and only permits a single username to login with SSH keys.

username / password logins are just too open to abuse.

Have another answer? Share your knowledge.