Report this

What is the reason for this report?

Which data centers for high availability

Posted on January 14, 2015

I need to build a redundant infrastructure for our web based solution in order to address availability needs. I cannot tell if two different New York data centers would be sufficiently isolated or would it be better to go San Francisco and New York? Would New York to New York latency be shorter than New York to San Francisco? I ask because either a reverse proxy to support sticky sessions or mirrored session data are going to require connections between data centers and both bandwidth and latency issues need to be considered.

The application I’m working with provides management services for service oriented non-profits, so we have a specific group of group of client using the service that are all located in the US.

Note: I selected the Load Balancing Tag because she same technologies are often used for load balancing, but my primary concern is continuous availability.



This textbox defaults to using Markdown to format your answer.

You can type !ref in this text area to quickly search our full set of tutorials, documentation & marketplace offerings and insert the link!

These answers are provided by our Community. If you find them useful, show some love by clicking the heart. If you run into issues leave a comment, or add your own answer to help others.

This question was answered by @ryanpq:

Our NYC data centers are in separate facilities and should be sufficiently isolated for your needs. You should see lower latency between two NYC data centers just by means of geography if nothing else.

View the original comment

The developer cloud

Scale up as you grow — whether you're running one virtual machine or ten thousand.

Get started for free

Sign up and get $200 in credit for your first 60 days with DigitalOcean.*

*This promotional offer applies to new accounts only.