Question

Which data centers for high availability

Posted January 14, 2015 4.4k views

I need to build a redundant infrastructure for our web based solution in order to address availability needs. I cannot tell if two different New York data centers would be sufficiently isolated or would it be better to go San Francisco and New York? Would New York to New York latency be shorter than New York to San Francisco? I ask because either a reverse proxy to support sticky sessions or mirrored session data are going to require connections between data centers and both bandwidth and latency issues need to be considered.

The application I’m working with provides management services for service oriented non-profits, so we have a specific group of group of client using the service that are all located in the US.

Note: I selected the Load Balancing Tag because she same technologies are often used for load balancing, but my primary concern is continuous availability.

2 comments
  • Our NYC data centers are in separate facilities and should be sufficiently isolated for your needs. You should see lower latency between two NYC data centers just by means of geography if nothing else.

  • Thank you for the response, I will try to New York data centers.

    Was experimenting last night and west to east was very fast but east to west seemed substantially slower. Maybe just going east to east will resolve a bit of that.

    We only get private network capabilities within one data center, not across the three New York centers, correct?

These answers are provided by our Community. If you find them useful, show some love by clicking the heart. If you run into issues leave a comment, or add your own answer to help others.

×
1 answer

This question was answered by @ryanpq:

Our NYC data centers are in separate facilities and should be sufficiently isolated for your needs. You should see lower latency between two NYC data centers just by means of geography if nothing else.

View the original comment

Submit an Answer