Report this

What is the reason for this report?

Droplet naming scheme and FQDN

Posted on November 27, 2014

I’ve always named my droplets as FQDN, it just seemed natural to do it that way. So most of the droplet I own are accessible from the web, since it was needed.

So here I am, wanting to create the first machine I need that doesn’t have to be accessible from the web. How should I name it? I know I could name it as FQDN and just not setup the DNS for it, but is there any other advantages to FQDN other than being a logical choice for internet accessibility? Does it change anything to name a machine that isn’t though to be accessible via the web as something else than FQDN?



This textbox defaults to using Markdown to format your answer.

You can type !ref in this text area to quickly search our full set of tutorials, documentation & marketplace offerings and insert the link!

These answers are provided by our Community. If you find them useful, show some love by clicking the heart. If you run into issues leave a comment, or add your own answer to help others.

The name of the droplet is used in the PTR record, whether you have an A record or not for it… it should be an FQDN.

I pick a unique name for each of my servers, and use that as a subdomain for my domain. For example:

server7.ahrotahntee.ca

Where server7 is the name of the server, and ahrotahntee.ca is my domain name.

The developer cloud

Scale up as you grow — whether you're running one virtual machine or ten thousand.

Get started for free

Sign up and get $200 in credit for your first 60 days with DigitalOcean.*

*This promotional offer applies to new accounts only.