Related

Why am I getting a Deploy Error: Health Checks? Question Question
How can I see the build logs for my application if the build was skipped for a deployment? Question Question

Question

Exclude GitHub repo files from being deployed

Posted March 26, 2021 248 views
DigitalOcean App Platform

I’ve a hunch I’m going to kick myself, but…

Is there a way to commit files to repo but exclude them from being deployed?

I’ve a very simple static site and deployment using Apps works fine.

However, I’d like to document the repo too and exclude those files from being deployed.

I can’t exclude them with .gitignore because I’d like them committed to the repo.

I tried .dockerignore but the files continue to be copied.

Add a comment
dazwilkin
By:
dazwilkin

Related

Why am I getting a Deploy Error: Health Checks? Question Question
How can I see the build logs for my application if the build was skipped for a deployment? Question Question

These answers are provided by our Community. If you find them useful, show some love by clicking the heart. If you run into issues leave a comment, or add your own answer to help others.

×
Submit an Answer
1 answer
crashoverride March 26, 2021

👋 @dazwilkin

Great question, when generating your static site, saving the content you want to deploy to a specific folder, called an output directory, will only deploy those files. Anything not in that folder will not get deployed.

This can be set under the static site component in your apps Components tab.

Reply Report
  • dazwilkin March 26, 2021

    Aha! Great. Thank you

    Reply Report
  • dazwilkin March 26, 2021

    I’m unable to get this to work.

    I’ve tried moving the content to ./public (and initially not changing but then setting output_dir in the spec) and to /.www (and specifying this in the spec’s output_dir.

    Regardless of what I try, I receive deployment errors:

    Initializing build
Retrieving source code to /workspace
Selecting branch "master"
Checking out commit "41d5c299..."
Validating environment

Building app using buildpacks
Running buildpack detection

ERROR: No buildpack groups passed detection.
ERROR: Please check that you are running against the correct path.
ERROR: failed to detect: no buildpacks participating

    I reverted to everything in the repo / and removed the output_dir to get the deployment to succeed.

    Reply Report
    • crashoverride March 26, 2021

      Okay, with my first answer I made a (poor) assumption that your app was building the content. It sounds like the content is already built and staticly exists in your repo.

      In that case you’d need to set a source_dir, unfortunately this is not available in our UI yet.

      Here are some steps to get this working, I will post some links at the end with references/api.

      We want to update your existing app spec to explicitly tell App Platform where your static site lives within the repository. Let’s assume it’s in a public directory in the root of your repository.

      1. Get app spec from the settings tab of your app, eg:

        name: my-site
static_sites:
- github:
branch: master
deploy_on_push: true
repo: my-account/my-site
name: my-site
routes:
- path: /

      2. Now we will add the source_dir and save it to a file, our app spec now becomes:

        name: my-site
static_sites:
- github:
branch: master
deploy_on_push: true
repo: my-account/my-site
name: my-site
routes:
- path: /
source_dir: public

      3. Now we need to push this change using the doctl CLI tool: doctl apps update <app_id> --spec ./my_app_spec.yaml

      Note: the appid is in the URL of your app as a UUID/GUID format, for example https://cloud.digitalocean.com/apps/1ed39f51-c095-47cc-9dcf-2fe9bda05555 the appid is 1ed39f51-c095-47cc-9dcf-2fe9bda05555

      After this your app should automatically build and deploy using the content that only exists in the public folder of your repository.

      Some links:

      We realize this is a pain and intend to add the ability to both specify a source_dir in the UI as well as update a the spec within the browser in the near future.

      Feel free to reply here if you run into trouble, or submit a support ticket and we can take a look at your particular app.

      Thanks for the great feedback :)

      Reply Report

Related

Looking for something else?

Ask a new question Search for more help