Question

Is there consistency between how volume and mount points are named?

What is the convention on how external block storage devices are named and how mount points are named?

I have volume whose naming follows this pattern: first-second.

I expect that mountpoint and partitions will follow the same pattern: /mnt/first-second and /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0DO_Volume_first-second .

Instead the result is /mnt/first_second and /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0DO_Volume_first_second .

Can we have volume names, mount points, and partitions adher to the same convention? This is a great help with provision and configuration tools.

Subscribe
Share

Question:

What is the convention on how external block storage devices are named and how mount points are named?

Issue/Feature Request:

Volume names are expected to consist of only lowercase alphanumeric characters. Therefore the expectation is that the mount points and partitions follow the same convention.

Expectation

In essence, given a volume with naming pattern: first-second, I expect that:

  • volume name
  • mountpoint
  • partition

will follow the same pattern: which is:

  • volume_name = first-second
  • mountpoint = /mnt/first-second
  • partition = /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0DO_Volume_first-second

This expectation matches the example provided here :

/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0DO_Volume_volume-nyc1-01:       symbolic link to ../../sda
/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0DO_Volume_volume-nyc1-01-part1: symbolic link to ../../sda1

Result

Instead the result is:

  • volume_name = first-second
  • mountpoint = /mnt/first_second
  • partition = /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0DO_Volume_first_second

Clarification Needed

Can we have volume names, mount points, and partitions adher to the same convention? This is a great help with provision and configuration tools.


Submit an answer
You can type!ref in this text area to quickly search our full set of tutorials, documentation & marketplace offerings and insert the link!