Is there consistency between how volume and mount points are named?
What is the convention on how external block storage devices are named and how mount points are named?
I have volume whose naming follows this pattern: first-second.
I expect that mountpoint and partitions will follow the same pattern: /mnt/first-second and /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0DO_Volume_first-second .
Instead the result is /mnt/first_second and /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0DO_Volume_first_second .
Can we have volume names, mount points, and partitions adher to the same convention? This is a great help with provision and configuration tools.
Question:
What is the convention on how external block storage devices are named and how mount points are named?
Issue/Feature Request:
Volume names are expected to consist of only lowercase alphanumeric characters. Therefore the expectation is that the mount points and partitions follow the same convention.
Expectation
In essence, given a volume with naming pattern:
first-second, I expect that:will follow the same pattern: which is:
first-second/mnt/first-second/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0DO_Volume_first-secondThis expectation matches the example provided here :
Result
Instead the result is:
first-second/mnt/first_second/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0DO_Volume_first_secondClarification Needed
Can we have volume names, mount points, and partitions adher to the same convention? This is a great help with provision and configuration tools.