What is the convention on how external block storage devices are named and how mount points are named?
I have volume whose naming follows this pattern: first-second
.
I expect that mountpoint and partitions will follow the same pattern: /mnt/first-second
and /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0DO_Volume_first-second
.
Instead the result is /mnt/first_second
and /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0DO_Volume_first_second
.
Can we have volume names, mount points, and partitions adher to the same convention? This is a great help with provision and configuration tools.
Click below to sign up and get $100 of credit to try our products over 60 days!
Question:
What is the convention on how external block storage devices are named and how mount points are named?
Issue/Feature Request:
Volume names are expected to consist of only lowercase alphanumeric characters. Therefore the expectation is that the mount points and partitions follow the same convention.
Expectation
In essence, given a volume with naming pattern:
first-second
, I expect that:will follow the same pattern: which is:
first-second
/mnt/first-second
/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0DO_Volume_first-second
This expectation matches the example provided here :
Result
Instead the result is:
first-second
/mnt/first_second
/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0DO_Volume_first_second
Clarification Needed
Can we have volume names, mount points, and partitions adher to the same convention? This is a great help with provision and configuration tools.