Question
Question
Is there consistency between how volume and mount points are named?
What is the convention on how external block storage devices are named and how mount points are named?
I have volume whose naming follows this pattern: first-second.
I expect that mountpoint and partitions will follow the same pattern: /mnt/first-second and /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0DO_Volume_first-second .
Instead the result is /mnt/first_second and /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0DO_Volume_first_second .
Can we have volume names, mount points, and partitions adher to the same convention? This is a great help with provision and configuration tools.
Question:
What is the convention on how external block storage devices are named and how mount points are named?
Issue/Feature Request:
Volume names are expected to consist of only lowercase alphanumeric characters. Therefore the expectation is that the mount points and partitions follow the same convention.
Expectation
In essence, given a volume with naming pattern:
first-second, I expect that:will follow the same pattern: which is:
first-second/mnt/first-second/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0DO_Volume_first-secondThis expectation matches the example provided here :
Result
Instead the result is:
first-second/mnt/first_second/dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0DO_Volume_first_secondClarification Needed
Can we have volume names, mount points, and partitions adher to the same convention? This is a great help with provision and configuration tools.