Related

Product Managed Kubernetes on DigitalOcean Product
Will kubernetes have autoscaling by default? Question Question
Firewall blocks hostPort Question Question

Question

Shared storage on Digital Ocean Kubernetes

Posted November 21, 2018 3.9k views
Kubernetes

I have been experimenting with the early access of Kubernetes. In GKE, for example, it’s easy to setup a standard VM with an NFS server configured, and then install the Helm chart for nfs-client-provisioner so you can have shared storage among pods (for things like redundant Django apps running in different pods). I tried this with DO and it did not work, even when I monkeyed with the firewall settings for the k8s nodes.

I am unaware of another inexpensive shared storage option, the standard PVCs offered by DO don’t permit ReadWriteMany. Does anyone have a better solution?

Add a comment
cro
By:
cro

These answers are provided by our Community. If you find them useful, show some love by clicking the heart. If you run into issues leave a comment, or add your own answer to help others.

×
5 answers
cro December 14, 2018

Digital Ocean support comes through again–they let me know that they only just started to deploy the NFS tools on worker nodes and if I deployed a cluster with k8s version 1.11.3-do.1 it should work. I tried again today and nfs-server-provisioner works now, as well as rook.io with CephFS.

Quick bonnie++ test, two different clusters, same worker node configuration:

CephFS via Rook:

Version  1.97       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
Concurrency   1     -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
magical-ardinghe 4G   547  89 37557   4 24877   3   946  93 88786   5  3006  44
Latency               266ms    2444ms    3881ms   25122us     257ms     295ms
Version  1.97       ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
magical-ardinghelli -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
                 16   727   1 +++++ +++   481   1   794   2  1881   2   456   1
Latency              1128ms   23441us     672ms    1445ms   10984us     173ms
1.97,1.97,magical-ardinghelli-3l9v,1,1544812020,4G,,547,89,37557,4,24877,3,946,93,88786,5,3006,44,16,,,,,727,1,+++++
,+++,481,1,794,2,1881,2,456,1,266ms,2444ms,3881ms,25122us,257ms,295ms,1128ms,23441us,672ms,1445ms,10984us,173ms

For NFS:

Version  1.97       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
Concurrency   1     -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
nfs-busybox-dfdb 4G  1000  95 31489   2 135902  13  1287  93 229139  11  2707  33
Latency             19663us   36927ms     182ms     117ms   80444us   27791us
Version  1.97       ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
nfs-busybox-dfdb5c6 -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
                 16  1157  14 23094  15  1565  20   249   3  4797  22  1559  19
Latency              9404us   29618us   10571us     662ms    4625us   17487us
1.97,1.97,nfs-busybox-dfdb5c685-vckmj,1,1544823234,4G,,1000,95,31489,2,135902,13,1287,93,229139,11,2707,33,16,,,,,1157,14,23094,15,1565,20,249,3,4797,22,1559,19,19663us,36927ms,182ms,117ms,80444us,27791us,9404us,29618us,10571us,662ms,4625us,17487us0
Reply Report
Trurl December 5, 2018

Looks like workers just don’t have nfs tools to mount NFS. Both nfs-server-provisioner over “do-block-storage” and external nfs server (already used on my old k8s cluster) failed to mount.

Reply Report
cro December 5, 2018

Good thinking to try nfs-server-provisioner. I suspected that the nfs tools packages were not installed on the nodes. I wish we could ssh into the nodes, could have answered that question much quicker.

Any other ideas for shared storage? I considered rook.io and fired up a cluster just to test that but couldn’t get it working. Also there are big scary warnings on the Ceph site saying that CephFS is not for production use.

Reply Report
cro December 13, 2018

For future reference, I was looking at outdated CephFS documentation. It is considered stable now.

Reply Report
mi75 December 20, 2018
Reply Report
Submit an Answer

Related

Looking for something else?

Ask a new question Search for more help