Question
Updating GitLab CE 8.9.5 to latest version from one-click install
- Posted on January 24, 2017
- DigitalOcean 1-Click Apps MarketplaceUbuntu
Asked by Danick Gevry
Hi,
I’m trying to get the latest version of GitLab on my droplet. Initially, I installed GitLab from the One-Click Install. I followed some instructions from this question, but I keep getting the same error in my console:
W: Duplicate sources.list entry https://packages.gitlab.com/gitlab/gitlab-ce/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/packages.gitlab.com_gitlab_gitlab-ce_ubuntu_dists_trusty_main_binary-amd64_Packages)
W: Duplicate sources.list entry https://packages.gitlab.com/gitlab/gitlab-ce/ubuntu/ trusty/main i386 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/packages.gitlab.com_gitlab_gitlab-ce_ubuntu_dists_trusty_main_binary-i386_Packages)
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
The droplet is running Ubuntu 14.04. Let me know what information I should also provide.
Best regards,
This textbox defaults to using Markdown to format your answer.
You can type !ref in this text area to quickly search our full set of tutorials, documentation & marketplace offerings and insert the link!
These answers are provided by our Community. If you find them useful, show some love by clicking the heart. If you run into issues leave a comment, or add your own answer to help others.
Get our biweekly newsletter
Sign up for Infrastructure as a Newsletter.
Hollie's Hub for Good
Working on improving health and education, reducing inequality, and spurring economic growth? We'd like to help.
Become a contributor
Get paid to write technical tutorials and select a tech-focused charity to receive a matching donation.
@danickgevry
From the CLI, run
uname -mto get your arch. You should see eitherx86_64ori386.Once you know what arch you’re running, all you need to do is remove the line that doesn’t match it and then run
apt-get updateagain to sync the packages for your distro.Normally the
sources.listfile is in/etc/apt, though you may need to look inor
… since that’s where the error is pointing.
This comment has been deleted