I was recently asked what is the difference between rm and rm -rf and I thought that it would be nice to share the answer with here as well.

These answers are provided by our Community. If you find them useful, show some love by clicking the heart. If you run into issues leave a comment, or add your own answer to help others.

×
1 answer

If you only run rm it would only delete the named files and not directories. A rundown of the -rf arguments:

  • -r, -R, --recursive - is used to recursively delete the content of a directory, including hidden files and subdirectories.

  • -f, --force - Attempt to remove the files without prompting for confirmation, regardless of the file’s permissions.

Here’s an example of what would happen if you only run rm and try to delete a directory:

rm dir1

The output that you would get is:

rm: dir1: is a directory

So to delete a folder you would just need to add the -r argument:

rm -r dir1

Regarding the -f argument, sometimes when deleting a file you would be asked for permissions, it would look something like this:

rm -f file1

Output:

rm: remove regular empty file 'file1'? yes

It is fine for a single file and it would prevent you from accidentally deleting a file, but if you are deleting hundreds of files, having to type yes for every single one could take ages. So to force the process just use the -f argument.

Hope that this helps!
Regards,
Bobby

Submit an Answer