Question
Why DO storage optimized droplets expensive compared to AWS, GCP?
I was comparing DO storage optimized droplet largest instance to AWS, GCP counterparts which you can see below.
DO storage optimized droplet
- Memory : 256GB
- CPUs : 32 vCPUs
- Storage : 7.03TB SSD
- Net interface speed : probably 2 GB/s
- Data Transfer Out: 10TB
- Cost / mo = $ 2,480
AWS
Instance Name : i3.x8large
- Memory : 244 GB
- CPUs : 32 vCPUs
- Storage : 4 x 1900 NVMe SSD = 7.6 TB
- Net interface speed :10 Gigabit
- Data transfer out : 10 TB
- Cost / mo = $ 2,388.62 (1 year no upfront reserve)
GCP
Instance type : n2-highmem-32
- Memory : 256 GB
- CPUs : 32 vCPUs
- Storage : 24 x 375 SSD = 9 TB
- Net interface speed : 7 GBs to the internet
- Data transfer out : 10 TB (standard tier)
- Cost / mo = $ 2,168.08 (1 year commitment)
As you can see DO storage optimized droplet is expensive compared to GCP, AWS instances. If you go with same AWS instance with 1 year full or partial upfront reserve things get more cheaper. I expected DO to be cheaper compared to AWS and GCP. Am I missing something here?
Another problem I see with DO droplets is network interface speed.
These answers are provided by our Community. If you find them useful, show some love by clicking the heart. If you run into issues leave a comment, or add your own answer to help others.
×