Report this

What is the reason for this report?

A Deep Dive into Cloud Auto Scaling Techniques

Published on July 31, 2025
A Deep Dive into Cloud Auto Scaling Techniques

Introduction

Auto scaling is a cloud computing technique in which the amount of computational resources in a hosting environment is dynamically adjusted based on its current workload. This allows an application’s supporting infrastructure to grow automatically when demand increases and shrink when demand subsides. Adding and removing resources manually is a process susceptible to human error and is likely to result in a situation where too few resources are available to support current demand (leading to slow performance or outages) or too many resources are in use(leading to waste of money and other resources). Auto scaling helps to address this issue by automatically adding and removing resources as required to maintain performance while optimizing costs.

In this post, we’ll explain how auto scaling works and why it’s important. We’ll examine different types of auto scaling and scaling policies. You’ll also see how major cloud providers support auto scaling, how Kubernetes autoscaling works, common pitfalls, and how to avoid them.

Key Takeaways

  • Auto scaling refers to the ability to dynamically adjust the amount of computational resources used to match the current demand. It’s commonly used to help achieve consistent performance while being cost-effective.
  • It removes manual scaling efforts and can also be used as a means to mitigate the risk of human error and prevent over-provisioning or under-provisioning. It ensures you only pay for what you use.
  • Auto scaling can be achieved by adding/removing servers (horizontal scaling) or increasing/decreasing existing server capacity (vertical scaling). This allows for a flexible response to workload changes.
  • AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, DigitalOcean, Kubernetes, and other popular platforms all offer auto-scaling functionality, making it available for most modern cloud-based workloads.
  • Configure your auto-scaling policies correctly to match your application’s needs. Ensure to review and test policies to avoid common auto-scaling pitfalls.

How Does Auto Scaling Work?

Auto scaling operates by tracking your application’s performance or load metrics, then automatically taking automated actions to add or remove resources when specified conditions are met. A high-level overview of the process is as follows:

  1. Monitoring – A service (cloud monitoring tool, Kubernetes metrics server, etc.) regularly measures and reports metrics for your app instances. This would include CPU utilization, memory usage, network traffic, and other relevant metrics. These metrics indicate the workload demand on your system.
  2. Scaling Policies / Triggers – You define the rules or policies under which you want to scale out (add capacity) or scale in (remove capacity). Policies can be based on thresholds value (e.g., “if avg. CPU > 80% for 10 mins, add 4 servers”), target values (e.g., “keep CPU at 60% by automatically adjusting instance count”), or schedules (e.g., “scale to 12 instances at 8 AM every weekday, scale to 5 after 9 PM”).
  3. Execution (Scaling Actions) – When the condition for a scaling policy is met, the auto scaling system will automatically execute the associated scaling action. For a scale-out event, it will provision additional resources. For a scale-in event, it will terminate or shut down the extra instances.
  4. Cooldown/Stabilization – Following a scaling action, auto scaling typically enforces a cooldown period (sometimes called stabilization period) during which further scaling actions are either paused or limited. This helps the system stabilize with the new capacity and prevents flapping (frequent up-and-down scaling).
  5. Scale to Desired State – Many auto scaling implementations also allow you to specify a desired capacity or target state. For example, you can specify that the desired number of instances is 6, the minimum is 4, and the maximum is 12 (in AWS Auto Scaling).

Behind the scenes, the auto-scaling service for each provider will manage the details. In all cases, the pattern is the same: monitor -> trigger -> scale action -> stabilize -> repeat, all based upon your defined policies.

Understanding Horizontal and Vertical Scaling

When discussing auto scaling, it’s important to understand the two fundamental ways a system can scale:

  • Horizontal Scaling (Scale Out/in): This refers to adding more instances of a resource to handle increased load or removing them when demand drops. For example, if you have a web service hosted on three servers, horizontally scaling it to handle more traffic might involve adding two additional servers (scaling out to five servers). If traffic decreases, scaling in might reduce the count back down to, e.g., three servers.
  • Vertical Scaling (Scale Up/Down): This involves increasing or decreasing the power of resources assigned to a single instance – e.g., migrating your application to a larger server with more CPU, RAM, or disk, or adding more resources to a virtual machine. For instance, vertical scaling may mean changing the size of an Azure VM from 2 vCPUs / 8 GB RAM to 8 vCPUs / 32 GB RAM. Some workloads might require vertical scaling if they cannot be distributed to run on multiple nodes. In practice, modern cloud systems in production use horizontal scaling for elasticity whenever possible, and vertical scaling as a supplementary approach.

Auto Scaling Methods Across Cloud Providers

The major cloud providers provide auto-scaling. Applications are kept responsive and cost is optimized by automatically scaling virtual machines or containers as required.

AWS Auto Scaling

Amazon Web Services provides different types of auto-scaling services:

  • EC2 Auto Scaling Groups – Performs operations on multiple Amazon EC2 instance groups. Users set minimum, maximum, and desired capacity, and the auto scaling group automatically replaces unhealthy instances and adds/removes capacity based on defined policies.
  • Application Auto Scaling – Allows you to scale multiple AWS resources (like ECS containers, DynamoDB throughput, and Lambda concurrency) based on utilization.
  • AWS Auto Scaling (service) – A single service that recommends and orchestrates scaling policies across multiple AWS services.

Auto Scaling can be managed via the AWS Management Console, AWS CLI, SDKs, or infrastructure-as-code tools such as CloudFormation. With a CloudFormation template, you can specify an AWS::AutoScaling::AutoScalingGroup resource along with the essential properties such as MinSize, MaxSize, and the network subnet where you want to place your instances. You then associate the group with an AWS::AutoScaling::ScalingPolicy, which determines when and how scaling occurs. For example, you may want to set a policy to maintain average CPU utilization at about 50%, with a cooldown period of 5 minutes to prevent quick scaling decisions. The following YAML code snippet shows a sample configuration:

Resources:
  MyAutoScalingGroup:
    Type: AWS::AutoScaling::AutoScalingGroup
    Properties:
      MinSize: '2'
      MaxSize: '20'
      DesiredCapacity: '2'
      VPCZoneIdentifier:
        - subnet-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   # Specify your subnet ID(s) here
      LaunchTemplate:
        LaunchTemplateId: !Ref MyLaunchTemplate
        Version: !GetAtt MyLaunchTemplate.LatestVersionNumber

  MyCPUScalingPolicy:
    Type: AWS::AutoScaling::ScalingPolicy
    Properties:
      AutoScalingGroupName: !Ref MyAutoScalingGroup
      PolicyType: TargetTrackingScaling
      TargetTrackingConfiguration:
        PredefinedMetricSpecification:
          PredefinedMetricType: ASGAverageCPUUtilization
        TargetValue: 50          # Maintain 50% CPU utilization
      Cooldown: '300'            # 5-minute cooldown

  MyLaunchTemplate:
    Type: AWS::EC2::LaunchTemplate
    Properties:
      LaunchTemplateData:
        ImageId: ami-0c55b159cbfafe1f0     # Example Amazon Linux 2 AMI
        InstanceType: t2.micro

Auto Scaling Group will automatically adjust the size of EC2 instances to meet demand and maintain optimal CPU utilization, scaling out or in as needed.

Azure Auto Scaling

Microsoft Azure provides a feature called virtual machine scale sets (VMSS) that can be used to scale virtual machines horizontally. It also includes an integrated Azure Autoscale service that can be used with other resources such as app services, cloud services, and more. Azure is more focused on the tight integration with other Azure components and strong hybrid cloud support (the same scaling strategy is used for scaling both on-premises and cloud deployments). For example, the VM scale sets enable you to deploy a set of identical VMs that can automatically scale (out or in) based on metrics or schedules.

Google Cloud Auto Scaling

Google Cloud Platform features managed instance groups, which can be used to autoscale virtual machine instances. Google Cloud Autoscaling is also well known for its ability to scale a containerized environment via Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), which provides automatic scaling of clusters and pods. Managed instance groups can autoscale based on a wide variety of signals (CPU, HTTP load balancing, queue metrics, etc.). They can also be integrated with GKE to handle autoscaling of the underlying cluster. There is an initialization period (cooldown) for GCP autoscaler during which it temporarily ignores metrics from newly created instances.

DigitalOcean Auto Scaling

DigitalOcean has introduced an auto-scaling feature for cloud services. Droplet autoscale pools allow automatic (add/remove) scaling of the number of Droplet (VM) instances in a pool based on CPU or memory usage, providing managed horizontal scaling for DigitalOcean cloud services. For example, you can define a pool of web server droplets to maintain a steady CPU usage of 60% and the pool will automatically scale out/in as needed. CPU-based auto scaling is also available in DigitalOcean App Platform, which automatically adds/removes application components (containers) based on a CPU usage threshold.

Kubernetes Autoscaling (Pods and Nodes)

Kubernetes is a container orchestration platform that provides auto-scaling capabilities. It is widely used in cloud environments (and sometimes in on-premises environments as well). There are two planes of scaling within Kubernetes:

Horizontal Pod Autoscaler
Horizontal pod autoscaler (HPA) is a Kubernetes controller that automatically scales the number of pod replicas for a workload (Deployment, ReplicaSet, StatefulSet, etc.) depending on the observed metrics. It allows you to scale the containerized application pods horizontally. Let’s consider you have a deployment with 2 pods of a web application. An HPA can monitor their CPU usage and increase the number of replicas to, for example, 5 pods if the CPU usage is high, and scale down to 2 when idle. By default, HPA scales based on CPU utilization (reported by the Kubernetes metrics server that collects the CPU/memory usage from nodes). It can also be configured for scaling based on memory usage (through the metrics server) and custom metrics (with the autoscaling/v2 API). You will build a HorizontalPodAutoscaler resource definition in YAML (or using kubectl autoscale). It will contain the target deployment (or other workload controller), a minimum and maximum number of replicas to scale between, and the target metric threshold. Here’s an example of an HPA configuration targeting CPU usage:

apiVersion: autoscaling/v1
kind: HorizontalPodAutoscaler
metadata:
  name: my-app-hpa
  labels:
    app: my-app
spec:
  scaleTargetRef:
    apiVersion: apps/v1
    kind: Deployment
    name: my-app
  minReplicas: 2
  maxReplicas: 10
  targetCPUUtilizationPercentage: 70

The Kubernetes system will maintain a minimum number of pods for the my-app deployment at 2 while limiting the maximum to 10. The number of pods will scale up (add) or scale down (remove) to keep an average CPU utilization across all pods of ~70%. If CPU consumption per pod crosses the threshold, more pods should be added (up to a maximum of 10 here).

If the target percentage is less than 70% and the pods are underutilized, the number of pods will decrease (but not less than 2 as set by minReplicas). It is worth noting that the HPA checks for metrics at defined intervals. The interval is controlled by the horizontal-pod-autoscaler-sync-period parameter, which sets the frequency of HPA’s scaling decisions updates based on the observed metrics. It also takes into account a stabilization window to prevent it from frequently scaling up and down.

Cluster Autoscaler (CA)
Let’s consider that our Kubernetes cluster is out of capacity (no free CPU/Memory on any node to schedule new pods). In this case, HPA cannot add more nodes on its own; this is where the cluster autoscaler comes in. Cluster Autoscaler runs as a component of a Kubernetes cluster, interacting with the cloud provider (or other infrastructure) to add/remove worker nodes (VMs) in the cluster based on the pending pods. Here are some key essential points for managing Kubernetes autoscaler:

  • For managed services (GKE, EKS, AKS, etc.), you will enable cluster autoscaling by specifying the minimum and maximum nodes on a node pool. The cluster autoscaler will watch the Kubernetes scheduler.
  • If there are pods that can’t be scheduled because of a lack of resources (i.e., you requested 1 CPU but no node has 1 CPU available), it will signal the cloud to create a new VM and add it to the cluster.
  • On the other hand, if it detects underutilized nodes and determines that their pods can be relocated to other nodes without affecting overall capacity, it may scale down (remove) the underutilized nodes, provided that the remaining capacity exceeds current demand.

Best Practices: Each node group (pool) should contain homogeneous instance types, and you typically label the node groups that can scale. The autoscaler follows Pod disruption budgets rules to prevent terminating essential pods. It also won’t scale down if that would violate a pod’s requirements (such as a pod that can’t be moved).

Many cloud-managed Kubernetes offerings take care of the cluster autoscaler for you once it is enabled (e.g., DigitalOcean Kubernetes (DOKS) provides a built-in autoscaler for node pools as well).

Comparing Manual Scaling, Auto Scaling, and Elastic Scaling

Auto scaling can be a confusing subject when trying to differentiate between manual provisioning, policy-driven system scaling, and the cloud-native notion of elasticity. In the table below, we will break down the differences between manual scaling, auto scaling, and elastic scaling. This will allow you to understand how these three concepts differ in operation, triggers, precision, and even some real-world examples. DevOps and cloud teams can use these key differentiators to decide which is most appropriate for their workloads.

Scaling Approach Definition Trigger Mechanism Speed & Precision Drawbacks / Risks Cloud Examples
Manual Scaling Human-driven adjustments via console or scripts, often involving static or reactive provisioning. Triggered manually by operators (console, CLI, tickets) Slow (minutes–hours), often imprecise and conservative Labor-intensive, error-prone, and costly due to over-provisioning Manually resizing EC2 or VM instances
Auto Scaling Automated policy-driven scaling based on rules, metrics, or schedules. System-managed via thresholds, target tracking, or scheduled events Fast (seconds–minutes), consistent, and efficient Requires accurate configuration; misconfigured policies may lead to instability or excessive cost AWS Auto Scaling Groups, Azure VM Scale Sets, GCP Managed Instance Groups, Kubernetes HPA/VPA
Elastic Scaling The broader concept of matching resources to demand in real time, auto-scaling often supports this behavior. Implicit in the platform, typically built into serverless or PaaS services Near-instant (sub-second to seconds), highly efficient Limited manual control; scaling logic is abstracted away AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, Google Cloud Functions, DigitalOcean App Platform

Manual scaling will have a slower response time because it depends on a human to trigger scaling activities. Auto scaling is pre-emptive and reactive. It comes with system-defined scaling rules that trigger expansion quickly, and should be able to shrink as quickly as the underlying infrastructure allows. Elastic scaling is the cloud-native nirvana: resources automatically and instantly grow and shrink, driven behind the scenes by autoscaling engines.

Auto Scaling Policies: Dynamic, Scheduled, and Predictive

Auto scaling policies define the WHEN and HOW of your scaling activity. The right combination of policies will keep the system ultra-resilient during spikes, cost-optimized during downtime, and highly-responsive to fluctuating workloads.

Policy Type Trigger / Mechanism Pros Cons / Caveats Supported By
Dynamic (Reactive) Monitors real-time metrics (CPU, memory, latency, queue length). Threshold-based: e.g., “CPU > 70% for 5 min → +2 instances; CPU < 20% for 10 min → –1 instance.” Target tracking: maintain a target value using algorithmic adjustments. Responds to sudden load spikes. Highly automated and granular May lag during abrupt surges. Requires careful tuning of thresholds and cooldowns AWS ASG, Azure Monitor Autoscale, GCP MIG, Kubernetes HPA
Scheduled Scaling Time-based actions (e.g., “Every weekday at 8 AM, add instances”). Acts like a cron job for scaling. Ideal for predictable load cycles. Ensures capacity is ready ahead of time Cannot react to unexpected events. Requires accurate forecasting of usage AWS Scheduled Actions, Azure schedule rules, GCP scheduled autoscaling, DigitalOcean Pools
Predictive Scaling Uses ML on historical data to forecast demand and proactively scale (e.g., 15–60 min ahead). Reduces scaling lag. Optimized for recurring patterns. Requires ≥1–2 weeks of data. May mispredict irregular events AWS Predictive ASG, Azure Predictive VMSS, GCP Predictive MIG
Manual (Fixed) Human-managed; auto scaling disabled or adjusted manually—common during maintenance or debugging. Full control when needed. Useful during emergencies No automatic responsiveness. Can lead to inefficient resource usage Supported by all major clouds as a baseline

Key Insights

  • Start with dynamic policies for immediate reactivity. Adjust thresholds and stabilization windows as required.
  • Stack scheduled policies on top of dynamic ones for recurring load patterns (business hours, maintenance windows, and more).
  • Consider predictive scaling if you have extensive historical data and cyclic demand patterns in your environment. Predictive scaling will help to prepare your near-term demand.
  • The Manual policy should be used to maintain control during system outages and troubleshooting operations.

Common Auto Scaling Mistakes

Auto scaling makes cloud management easier, but it can cause problems if not set up correctly. Here are some common issues to look out for:

Adding too many or too few resources
Issue: If your scaling policies are not defined correctly, you may end up with overprovisioning of resources (for example, adding too many servers), leading to wasteful costs. It can also lead to underprovisioning of servers, leading to performance issues. Best Practice: You can test and fine-tune your settings and scale up/down to the right size according to your needs.

Sudden load can lead to delayed scaling
Issue: Auto scaling may respond slowly to a sudden increase in load, due to a delay in monitoring the resources or a slow process when adding more servers. Best Practice: Containers are faster when it comes to scaling, since you can configure them to spin up in seconds. You can also pre-plan your scale (up or down) for events you know will have high traffic.

Compatibility issues with legacy systems Issue: Legacy applications may not be configured to scale horizontally or to interact with orchestration systems. Therefore, auto-scaling such systems may lead to instability and errors. Best Practice: You can test your workloads and their dependencies to determine if they are cloud-native and stateless before implementing auto-scaling. Legacy applications could be refactored for scalability, where possible. You can also use manual scaling for any components that cannot be modernized.

FAQ’s

What is auto-scaling in cloud computing?

Auto scaling is the automated process of adjusting computing resources (VMs, containers, servers) in real time to match the actual workload. It’s used to maintain application performance and optimize costs.

What’s the difference between horizontal and vertical scaling?

Horizontal scaling involves adding/removing instances (scale out/in), improving fault tolerance and parallelism, while vertical scaling involves increasing/decreasing resources on a single instance (scale up/down).

What triggers auto scaling to happen?

Triggers are typically metrics such as CPU usage, memory usage, request rate, queue length, or custom application-specific metrics.

Conclusion

Auto scaling is a cloud service that dynamically adjusts the resources for your application based on the actual demand. It can help you avoid under- or overprovisioning and ensure that your app can handle incoming traffic. Manual scaling is slow and prone to human error, while elastic scaling provides the gold standard of resource management. Auto scaling provides the perfect balance, allowing modern applications to operate efficiently at any scale. Follow best practices, avoid common pitfalls, and customize auto scaling policies for your workload. When configured properly, auto scaling helps deliver reliable performance and optimize cost. This will enable you and your teams to focus on innovation, not infrastructure.

References and Resources

Thanks for learning with the DigitalOcean Community. Check out our offerings for compute, storage, networking, and managed databases.

Learn more about our products

About the author(s)

Adrien Payong
Adrien Payong
Author
AI consultant and technical writer
See author profile

I am a skilled AI consultant and technical writer with over four years of experience. I have a master’s degree in AI and have written innovative articles that provide developers and researchers with actionable insights. As a thought leader, I specialize in simplifying complex AI concepts through practical content, positioning myself as a trusted voice in the tech community.

Shaoni Mukherjee
Shaoni Mukherjee
Editor
Technical Writer
See author profile

With a strong background in data science and over six years of experience, I am passionate about creating in-depth content on technologies. Currently focused on AI, machine learning, and GPU computing, working on topics ranging from deep learning frameworks to optimizing GPU-based workloads.

Still looking for an answer?

Was this helpful?


This textbox defaults to using Markdown to format your answer.

You can type !ref in this text area to quickly search our full set of tutorials, documentation & marketplace offerings and insert the link!

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Join the Tech Talk
Success! Thank you! Please check your email for further details.

Please complete your information!

The developer cloud

Scale up as you grow — whether you're running one virtual machine or ten thousand.

Get started for free

Sign up and get $200 in credit for your first 60 days with DigitalOcean.*

*This promotional offer applies to new accounts only.